Oh and by the way, the article is now worst than it was before. Keep your paranoid thoughts to yourself and assume good faith instead of thinking everyone is out to "destroy" articles you like. Fleet Command ( talk) 12:11, 27 November 2010 (UTC) No one destroyed anything and no one ever said they own Wikipedia. Next time, if you felt an article has problems, instead of destroying it, stand aside and let other people fix it. I think your original objection is now fulfilled. Last but not least, the article is now in prose form. You should learn to be civil and enter discussions instead of responding to other people's objections with the brute force of revert. Therefore, your act of responding to my BRD revert with another revert is an instance of edit warring. Even if I am wrong, it is still a bold edit that I find controversial and hence I am still perfectly at liberty to undo it per WP:BRD. Third, in my humble opinion, Ckatz edit is vandalism because it is ruinous it destroys what can be fixed instead of destroying. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort in which pretty much everything works through consensus, not mere feelings. Otherwise, keep your feeling to yourself: You don't own Wikipedia.
#Truehd 7.1 atmos player manual#
Second, this article does not violate Wikipedia Manual of Style. If you don't think this article is notable, nominate it for deletion in WP:AFD but I believe this article will survive your nomination.
#Truehd 7.1 atmos player Pc#
Mike Allen 11:24, 27 November 2010 (UTC)įirst, the article is notable because it meets the requirements of Wikipedia General Notability Guideline, meaning that it has received significant coverage in reliable secondary source source such as PC Advisor magazine, CNET Editor's Review and LAPTOP magazine. Also, I don't know how you figured this edit was vandalism. I don't see any indication that it's notable. I remember when this article was created in November 2009 (I uploaded the first screenshot and logo) I didn't think it would last this long. Where's the product history, the technology, the company that develops it, reviews for the program? You know real world details? This is equivalent of only writing plot summaries for film articles and not adding other details like the production and reception. I don't know what the "software manual of style" guidelines look like on Wikipedia since I mostly edit film articles, but I'm sure this article does not meet that style. Listing only features looks like you're trying to sell the product. Fleet Command ( talk) 11:11, 27 November 2010 (UTC) Well I thought I was pretty clear. I won't make it completely prose but I think I can satisfy you. However, I think I can tone down the article's overly bold look. It does not use peacock terms or any other feature of the advertisement. The article describes the features from a neutral point of view. Fleet Command ( talk) 11:04, 27 November 2010 (UTC)Īs for you MikeAllen, I don't know why you feel like that. There are three good reviews cited in the article. Fleet Command ( talk) 11:02, 27 November 2010 (UTC) Oh, wait! It doesn't lack source too! It just lacks footnotes.
#Truehd 7.1 atmos player software#
The article introduces the software product in proper way. And no, the problem is from lack of source, not the style of writing. Ckatz chat spy 10:57, 27 November 2010 (UTC) What you did is pure vandalism. However, the list seemed more of an ad than encyclopaedic. Mike Allen 10:49, 27 November 2010 (UTC) Well it seems like User:Ckatz just solved that problem! Mike Allen 10:52, 27 November 2010 (UTC) It's probably not perfect, and will no doubt need some refining. To be honest, it looks like an advertisement since all the article focuses on is the the features of the program. I guess I'm just old fashioned about encyclopedias. Yes, I thought the article would be better in prose format, not just a list of features.
![truehd 7.1 atmos player truehd 7.1 atmos player](http://www.bigasoft.com/images/articles/truehd-converter/truehd-converter-for-windows-and-mac.jpg)
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale. Computing Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing Template:WikiProject Computing Computing articles If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. If you can improve it further, please do so. AVG PC TuneUp has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria.